They suck.
Okay, I guess I should elaborate more than that.
I guess you could say my problem with this year’s Oscar nominees is basically the same as my problem with the Oscar nominees every year. It’s once again not an award ceremony celebrating the best films of the year, but an love-fest dedicated to the best of certain types of films (save for Mad Max, which has miraculously snagged 10 nominations despite the fact that it’s actually entertaining).
It baffles me that every year you read how the Oscar viewership keeps slipping, and that they receive backlash from fans, yet they willingly continue to do the same things they always do, believing that simply changing the host will restore people’s faith in them.
If the Academy Awards really wanted to win over people and viewership, they should nominate movies people actually care about! Shocking, I know. But it’s crazy enough that it just might work.
Now, I’m not saying that they can’t also nominate the “smaller” artsy movies they love so much, or that they should just nominate any movie that a lot of people saw (that would equally as disastrous). But surely they can find some kind of middle ground?
The obvious omission this year is that Inside Out isn’t nominated for Best Picture, despite being the most acclaimed film of the year, one of the biggest box office champs of 2015, and probably one of the most warmly-embraced movies of recent memory. Sure, it got the token Best Animated Feature nomination, and a Best Original Screenplay mention, but there really is no reason why it shouldn’t be in the running for Best Picture, other than the Academy’s blatant bias against animated films. For people who often gloat about their embracing of the little guy and diversity, and trying to make changes to the world, they certainly are closed-minded when it comes to the movies they nominate.
Given that Star Wars: The Force Awakens is also critically acclaimed, and one of the biggest movies of all time, I think it’s earned a Best Picture mention as well. I mean, if James Cameron’s garishly CG’d retelling of Pocahontas, and Neil Blomkamp’s abysmal and pretentious District 9 can get a mention, there’s no reason why a return to form like The Force Awakens shouldn’t get its name in the Best Picture running.
Then there’s the other categories. Where is Inside Out’s Best Original Score nomination it so rightfully deserves? Or The Peanuts Movie in Best Animated Feature? Why the Hell has there never been a director of an animated film nominated for Best Director?
I’m also guessing that, just like last year’s award show, we’ll be seeing countless slams towards super hero films by the presenters, as they pretend that the artsy movies they nominate don’t have their own long list of cliches and predictability. God forbid some people make movies that actually gain an audience.
I’m probably getting too worked up over this. A wise man once said “you can’t win against fools.” And if the Academy of Motion Picture Arts & Sciences can’t be more open-minded towards different mediums and genres of films, particularly ones that prove acclaimed and timeless, then they most certainly are foolish. They probably aren’t worth me writing all of this. I mean, if you can’t nominate the most acclaimed film of the year (Inside Out) or the biggest cultural phenomenon (Star Wars) for Best Picture, then they’re clearly in the wrong line of work.
If doing the same thing and expecting different results is the definition of insanity, then the Academy must be comprised of an insane asylum.
Reblogged this on OUT OF ME HEAD.
LikeLike
A reoccurring problem with the Academy Awards is that too often, they play it safe. The most notable effect of this is that a lot of the films they put on such high pedestals ultimately have little to no staying power. There are exceptions, of course, but just think of the many times certain films failed to win “Picture of the Year” only to have a more significant impact on pop culture than the ones they lost to. Pulp Fiction is a great example, but even the critical favorite Citizen Kane wasn’t immune. The thing to take away from this is that the Academy has established a certain reality. Quality sci-fi and animated films are ignored because they don’t meld well with that reality.
In fact, the sole reason Avatar got a mention was because of Mr. Cameron’s influence in Hollywood. Similarly, District 9 was noticed by the Academy because, intentionally or not, the movie completely and utterly pandered to them. Ever notice what little effect those movies had on the sci-fi scene despite the former having been seen by everyone and the latter getting a ton of critical praise? It’s because history has almost always proven to be a more effective way of identifying works of genius than any trophy.
Also, we need more nods to foreign films; this isn’t the only country capable of producing good movies, after all.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I was so happy with the nominations Mad Max got that I ended up being satisfied with the overall list of candidates. However, you are right on target with your complaints… at least Inside Out got nominated for Best Original Script! Has an animated feature ever gotten one of those?
LikeLiked by 1 person
Unless I’m mistaken, I believe Toy Story, Finding Nemo, The Incredibles, Ratatouille, Wall-E and Up were also nominated for Original Screenplay, while Shrek and Toy Story 3 were nominated for Adapted Screenplay. Somehow or another, most of those films snagged more than twice as many nominations as Inside Out. And sadly, no animated film has ever won more than two Oscars (unless one counts Who Framed Roger Rabbit, which won 3 and earned a “Special Achievement” award for a total of 4).
LikeLiked by 1 person
I didn’t know those had run for the script awards. That’s cool!
And it is indeed sad how the Academy overlooks animated features.
LikeLiked by 1 person